[osg-users] Thoughts on Vulkan

Robert Osfield robert.osfield at gmail.com
Wed Apr 15 02:57:17 PDT 2015

Hi David, Chris et. al,

On 14 April 2015 at 22:47, Chris Hanson <xenon at alphapixel.com> wrote:

> I think OSG is a bad fit for Vulkan. OSG has so much code to support FFP
> dataflows that Vulkan doesn't have.
> I personally think a Vulkan scenegraph could be made from the components
> of OSG (OSG 4.x?) but bringing along all of OSG's legacy code into a Vulkan
> space would be counterproductive.

This is not far from my own viewpoint.  I do have a rough plan in mind that
is still evolving. I'll open my own thoughts for discussion once OSG-3.4 is
out the door.

Right now getting a OSG-3.4 is my focus.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openscenegraph.org/pipermail/osg-users-openscenegraph.org/attachments/20150415/a86ae1af/attachment-0003.htm>

More information about the osg-users mailing list