[osg-users] DEEP_COPY_USERDATA isn't that deep

Chris Djali krizdjali at gmail.com
Sun Sep 22 06:06:23 PDT 2019


How do you want backwards compatibility to be handled? The current behaviour could just be dropped, or it could be available under a new flag name like SHALLOW_COPY_USERDATA (potentially with the same value as the current deep copy one), or the new behaviour could be under a new flag name like DEEP_COPY_USERDATA_AND_CONTENTS.


Read this topic online here:

More information about the osg-users mailing list