[osg-users] Feedback/guidance sought on move of osgQt out into it's own project/repository

[Werner Modenbach]

Hi Robert,

if I recognized well, there are still frequent questions on the list
about Qt-interface in OSG.
At least we are using it very intensely. There was not much move in the
interface since long and so
we just take it as it was and as it works so far.
The threading problem is a bit unsatisfactory but we learned to live
with it.

For us it would be a big problem if further compatibility between OSG
and Qt would break.
I fully understand that you like to focus on the real OSG related tasks.
I have no idea what the best way would be for the future.
Unfortunately I also have not enough expertise to support Qt interface.

But I instantly hope there will be a good solution.

- Werner -

Am 06.09.2016 um 15:09 schrieb Robert Osfield:
> Do we not have any Qt users anymore? No one care enough to chip in?
>
> I'm not going to wait around forever before making decisions.  I need
> to get on with moving the OSG towards OSG-3.6.
>
> The OSG/Qt users need to decide how they want to progress from here
> once osgQt has been move out from the core OSG.  If you don't step up
> then osgQt will likely languish unloved and unsupported. I don't have
> the Qt expertise to do the support, you guys need to step up.
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users at lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

-- 
*TEXION Software Solutions*, Rotter Bruch 26a, D-52068 Aachen
Phone: +49 241 475757-0
Fax: +49 241 475757-29
Web: http://texion.eu
eMail: info at texion.eu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openscenegraph.org/pipermail/osg-users-openscenegraph.org/attachments/20160906/521ca588/attachment-0003.htm>